Power Lies

Threre is another serious flaw, and absolute proof that the campaign against Mr Lee Holloway is pure racism, and that is the number 165,000. What's in a number you ask? Well, first that number represents a total, but looks a whole lot like a price. The average price of a rental duplex in fact. Being such a seductive number, it is easy to pass it off as a cost instead of as a total, though in the back of anyone's mind, except for bigots who don't have consciences, we keep asking ourselves, what sort of institutional building would have that low of a price? The question remains pushed to the back as the county despot and his minions keep attacking the consequences of the assumed answer rather than allowing us to find the answer to the important question first, which would have entirely different consequences.

The answer is that this money, the $165,000 is the sum of rent collected by Mr. Holloway on his building, which was being rented by the OIC prior to their failed attempt to purchase it outright, a deal that may finally be in the process of going through. The sum represents rent collected over approximately two years. Funny that the plebian media throats and keys keep trying to pass this number off as some sort of up front payment for the building that Mr Holloway kept illicitly or something. That is not the case at all, but that is what is implied by the entire "ethics" case against Mr. Holloway, and the minority oppressing regime trying to persecute Mr Holloway is the only source championing this view. This is as irresponsible as any authority can be - backing a pure illusion.

If the media peasants really believe that collecting rent is tantamount to collecting payment for not rendering any service, they do not belong in the United States. We are a Capitalist society, which means that we all have the individual right to profit from the ownership of property. The condition of the property is regulated by law, but the fact of collecting rent on it is entirely market driven and 100% legitimate.

Isn't it even the slightest bit suspicious that everytime a Black Landlord makes the media, his right to be a capitalist is immediately suspect? Is it any wonder that the customs of property ownership come harder for a Black Person than for a White? Who does a Black Landlord go to with questions, technical specifications, problems and even for the basic culture that supports property OWNERSHIP? Most Black folk rent and not own.

And now, even when a Black man owns property and collects rent on it he is condemned for it by a zealot county executive who sees it as an "ethics" problem.

Milwaukee is at or near the bottom of the stack on almost every Black-White issue, the race card is valid here 99.993% of the time.

I forgive Mr E. Kane for getting the rent number wrong, he's got a job to keep.